An annual University census determined that there are more full-time undergraduates at GW this year than the University projected. Due to the increase, the University has allocated $1 million dollars to be spent on academic spending.
The Office of Institutional Research, which compiles the annual census, projected a 3.5 percent decrease in undergraduate enrollments this year, reflecting a smaller admissions target and trends for continuing student enrollment over the past three years. Despite projection, more undergraduates are at GW this year, as of Oct. 26 when the census was completed. University administrators said the fixed tuition may attract more students to stay at GW and not transfer out.
Revenue gained from the increase in undergraduate enrollments will allow the $1 million in cuts from academics last year to be given back to the schools, University officials said. Officials announced last year that they were waiting for the census results to determine whether the money would be replaced.
The University is considering where the $1 million will be allocated by reviewing budget proposals from various University departments.
Peggye Cohen, the assistant vice president for Institutional Research, said projections for continuing undergraduate students are made by finding the weighted average of the percent of continuing students in the past three years, and then consulting with the deans whether the number is reasonable.
"You can't predict the future. It's all based on history," Cohen said.
There are 77 more freshmen, 36 more transfer students and 111 more continuing full-time undergraduates than projected, according to the census.
"Our goal long-term is to have a high percentage returning each year," said Louis Katz, executive vice president and treasurer earlier this month.
Katz said enrolling more students than projected is not an issue unless they are all concentrated in a certain school.
Beginning in fall 2004, a fixed tuition plan allowed students to pay the same price for their entire time at GW. Vice President of Academic Affairs Donald Lehman said he thought fixed tuition may explain the higher retention rate because it allows students to plan better financially and not have to leave the school for financial reasons.
The Office of Institutional Research, which compiles the annual census, projected a 3.5 percent decrease in undergraduate enrollments this year, reflecting a smaller admissions target and trends for continuing student enrollment over the past three years. Despite projection, more undergraduates are at GW this year, as of Oct. 26 when the census was completed. University administrators said the fixed tuition may attract more students to stay at GW and not transfer out.
Revenue gained from the increase in undergraduate enrollments will allow the $1 million in cuts from academics last year to be given back to the schools, University officials said. Officials announced last year that they were waiting for the census results to determine whether the money would be replaced.
The University is considering where the $1 million will be allocated by reviewing budget proposals from various University departments.
Peggye Cohen, the assistant vice president for Institutional Research, said projections for continuing undergraduate students are made by finding the weighted average of the percent of continuing students in the past three years, and then consulting with the deans whether the number is reasonable.
"You can't predict the future. It's all based on history," Cohen said.
There are 77 more freshmen, 36 more transfer students and 111 more continuing full-time undergraduates than projected, according to the census.
"Our goal long-term is to have a high percentage returning each year," said Louis Katz, executive vice president and treasurer earlier this month.
Katz said enrolling more students than projected is not an issue unless they are all concentrated in a certain school.
Beginning in fall 2004, a fixed tuition plan allowed students to pay the same price for their entire time at GW. Vice President of Academic Affairs Donald Lehman said he thought fixed tuition may explain the higher retention rate because it allows students to plan better financially and not have to leave the school for financial reasons.
