While GW dropped to No. 53 in U.S. News and World Report's annual national universities rankings this year, University officials downplayed the significance of the slip.
After tying Pepperdine and Syracuse universities in the 52nd spot last year, GW dropped in the magazine's 2006 rankings, missing the top 50 for the seventh consecutive year. GW shares No. 53 with Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts.
University President Stephen Joel Trachtenberg said he does not pay much attention to the national rankings and instead focuses on how to improve GW based on its immediate competition.
"It is an issue of such irrelevance that it's hard to have any reaction," he said. "We compete with Boston University, Syracuse University, Tulane University, New York University, Emory University, and these are the places I keep my eye on," he said, mentioning schools that, with the exception of BU, are ranked higher than GW.
The magazine uses a few indicators to rank universities, including a school's peer assessment, graduation and retention rates, faculty resources, student selectivity, financial resources and alumni giving.
GW Director of Undergraduate Admissions Kathryn Napper said she thinks the magazine inaccurately ranks universities. GW's marks in certain areas, including admissions criteria, surpassed those of some universities that were ranked in the overall top 50.
"As always, I think we need to take the U.S. News rankings with a grain of salt," Napper wrote in an e-mail Monday. "All one has to do is look at the admissions criteria for a number of the schools in the top 50 versus GW to see the irrelevance of the rankings."
The rankings show that GW accepted 38 percent of its applicants last year, making the University more selective in admissions than most of the schools with rankings in the top 40s. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, which tied GW, accepted 75 percent of its applicants last year.
While GW's statistics were strong in areas such as freshman retention rate, class sizes and graduation rate, the University received comparatively lower percentages in the areas that measured full-time faculty and alumni giving.
After tying Pepperdine and Syracuse universities in the 52nd spot last year, GW dropped in the magazine's 2006 rankings, missing the top 50 for the seventh consecutive year. GW shares No. 53 with Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts.
University President Stephen Joel Trachtenberg said he does not pay much attention to the national rankings and instead focuses on how to improve GW based on its immediate competition.
"It is an issue of such irrelevance that it's hard to have any reaction," he said. "We compete with Boston University, Syracuse University, Tulane University, New York University, Emory University, and these are the places I keep my eye on," he said, mentioning schools that, with the exception of BU, are ranked higher than GW.
The magazine uses a few indicators to rank universities, including a school's peer assessment, graduation and retention rates, faculty resources, student selectivity, financial resources and alumni giving.
GW Director of Undergraduate Admissions Kathryn Napper said she thinks the magazine inaccurately ranks universities. GW's marks in certain areas, including admissions criteria, surpassed those of some universities that were ranked in the overall top 50.
"As always, I think we need to take the U.S. News rankings with a grain of salt," Napper wrote in an e-mail Monday. "All one has to do is look at the admissions criteria for a number of the schools in the top 50 versus GW to see the irrelevance of the rankings."
The rankings show that GW accepted 38 percent of its applicants last year, making the University more selective in admissions than most of the schools with rankings in the top 40s. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, which tied GW, accepted 75 percent of its applicants last year.
While GW's statistics were strong in areas such as freshman retention rate, class sizes and graduation rate, the University received comparatively lower percentages in the areas that measured full-time faculty and alumni giving.
